Times they are certainly changing and as an increasing number of our populations in developed economies are completing further education, only to become unemployed, the cries from, and about, ” over/under-qualified ” candidates come loudly from both sides of the hiring process. It’s hard to know what are our most marketable skill is.
This can cover:
too many/few years of experience,
education levels above/below demanded level
too highly paid in current or previous job, or simply unemployed
Both candidates and hiring managers are frequently guilty of wasting each other’s time. Candidates often apply for jobs sometimes in desperation, often times without any insightful or strategic thought, when their qualifications far exceed or fail to meet the demands made on the profile.
On the other hand organisations over- egg their job profile omelette assigning ludicrous qualifications and experience requirements to even low-level jobs.
Madeleine a research scientist told me “ I recently passed through a hiring process down to the final short list. I was eventually rejected on the grounds that I had a Masters and an MBA and would get bored with the job. My qualifications are clear on my resume. Although no process is ever a complete waste of time I actually took 3 afternoons off work to attend the interviews with the executive search company and then twice with the employer. If every company did this job seekers would be trouble with their current employers”
Alternatively, the concerns hiring managers have about placing candidates that are too highly qualified are in many instances valid. There could be repercussions for the team, the person could be onboarded and then leave because they lose interest or become disruptive or demotivated for the same reason
Do you struggle to identify the right candidates? Check out the executive search and research options?
So with workplaces and technology changing at such a rapid pace and job functions disappearing or being re-engineered faster than we realise, it is going to make the identification of the right calibre candidate hard to assess as transferable skills, training potential and cultural fit becoming increasingly important. By the same token it will also become increasingly challenging for candidates to know when they could the right fit for a particular job and if they should submit an application.
Ideal marketable skill
In that case it will therefore be more helpful for both parties to focus on requirements and qualities needed in the future:
Getting beyond job titles and focus on skills and achievements
Examine team playing abilities and leadership experience
Look at personality, enthusiasm, learning styles and flexibility
If we are currently preparing for jobs that don’t exist yet then provided that basic skills are in place, the most valuable and marketable skill candidates can have and need, will surely be the pace at which they can learn and adapt.
Add on other valuable soft skills which cement any career the lovely phrase “hire the will, train the skill” will come into play.
What do you think?